Re: reviving Fedora Legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 09:42:21AM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 01:30:21PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > > * Patrice Dumas [13/10/2008 13:23] :
> > > >
> > > > Why are you telling about half baked updates? Who will do that? Fedora
> > > 
> > > They're half-baked in the sense that there's less commitement
> > > post-EOL than pre-EOL.
> 
> > But post-EOL there is currently no commitment and there won't be any
> > promise on it. Some is better than not at all.
> 
> "Might someday get looked at and fixed, if somebody cares" is definitely
> much worse than "No more fixes, do upgrade".

It will still be "No more fixes, do upgrade" that will be the main
message, but packagers could have the possibility to care. If there are
enough packagers, then we'll communicate on this but only if succesful.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux