On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:05:08 +0200 Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx> wrote: > In that case skipping some of the fedora release, like doing the LTS > stuff only each year may help. before solving the "how many" problem... lets be realistic 1) Making every release LTS is not feasible, there's just not going to be enough manpower for that (history has shown that) for now at least. 2) I don't think users would even really demand such a beast 3) The volunteer base is a bit thin; current fedora volunteers tend to work on the latest version (or maybe two). In fact, so do many users. I would suggest focusing on first getting ONE such LTS release going. Figure out a plan on how to get out of it first (communication wise etc) in case interest isn't what you expect, and how to monitor the health. With that I suspect the fedora leadership will be happy to endorse it happily. Do one. Get that working. Don't even think about multiple until you have gotten one down. You'll learn so much that it's not worth planning beyond that. -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
