On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 14:46 +0100, Aidan Delaney wrote: > On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 13:26 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > No, not yet. We still haven't really worked out how to deal with the > > incestuous dependencies between libgcc and glibc (mostly that > > libgcc_shared.so needs to be linked against libc). > This is further complicated as some of us (I assist with spu > cross-complilers) use newlib rather than glibc. I guess you are aware that most of newlib/gcc can be built one-tree-style. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
