On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 13:26 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > No, not yet. We still haven't really worked out how to deal with the > incestuous dependencies between libgcc and glibc (mostly that > libgcc_shared.so needs to be linked against libc). This is further complicated as some of us (I assist with spu cross-complilers) use newlib rather than glibc. For spu-gcc we've come up with a solution where we have spu-gcc-bootstrap which is in the BuildRequires of spu-newlib. Then spu-gcc Conflicts with spu-gcc-bootstrap and Depends on spu-newlib. spu-gcc and spu-newlib are still available for package review in bugzilla should anyone so fancy to critique our approach? (Have I dropped enough hints? :) -- Aidan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
