Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Les Mikesell [13/10/2008 14:48] :
The issue is that the enterprise distributions don't put their own brand
name on the early development work and ship it so users have a smooth
transition through development, testing and the final release. But the
Again, this sounds like a problem that the entreprise distributions are
responsible.
Yes, of course. The change happened when RH stopped shipping X.0
versions that were subsequently updated to X.1, X.2, etc. as they did
through up through the 7.3 version, keeping the same community of users
through the process.
Working with them to release betas seems like the best
solution to your problem, IMHO.
But Fedora _is_ the beta now... Or at least it was before the direction
turned away from something suitable for servers. I'm not quite sure
where things are going now.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell#gmail.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
