On Sat, 2008-10-11 at 11:21 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 05:20:30PM -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote: > > A copy of the libtool script is typically included in a package. > > Breakage such as that patch fixes would only be incurred if > > libtoolize/autoreconf were run as part of the build process--something > > that simply shouldn't be happening in general for RPM builds. > > If I parse that correctly, are you saying that autoreconf *shouldn't* > be run as part of an RPM build? Yes. > I have found that it sometimes needs autoreconf if I patch the > configure.ac script -- something which happens rather more frequently > when porting to MinGW. (After these patches go upstream then it won't > be a problem of course). You should be patching configure, not configure.ac. -- Braden McDaniel e-mail: <braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <http://endoframe.com> Jabber: <braden@xxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
