On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 05:20:30PM -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote: > A copy of the libtool script is typically included in a package. > Breakage such as that patch fixes would only be incurred if > libtoolize/autoreconf were run as part of the build process--something > that simply shouldn't be happening in general for RPM builds. If I parse that correctly, are you saying that autoreconf *shouldn't* be run as part of an RPM build? I have found that it sometimes needs autoreconf if I patch the configure.ac script -- something which happens rather more frequently when porting to MinGW. (After these patches go upstream then it won't be a problem of course). Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones Read my OCaml programming blog: http://camltastic.blogspot.com/ Fedora now supports 68 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
