Karsten Hopp schrieb:
Josh Boyer schrieb:
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 01:14:28PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Orion Poplawski (orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
Should we get libtool 2.2.X into F-11 now?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435737
After beta freeze seems like a bad time to add a package that's going
to cause other things not to build. If it can be added as an additional
package that won't get int the way of builds that aren't expecting it,
it would be more palatable.
He said F-11. I would extrapolate that to mean "branch libtool
for F-10 now, and have devel be libtool 2.2.x." That would have
no bearing on rawhide/F-10.
josh
Getting libtool-2.2 into F-11 is my plan, but I most likely need to get
that through
FESCo as it breaks up to 300 packages according to my mass rebuilds. I'm
going to
prepare a Wiki page with details about that.
Karsten
Braden reminded me to post an update on this ;-)
My last rebuild showed only ~100 failures, I'm not sure what I've done differently
this time. I suspect that the removal of libtool-ltdl and all related packages from
my full-install might have caused this and I'm in the process of rebuilding those with libtool-2.
I've uploaded the current logs to http://karsten.fedorapeople.org/
After a quick glance at them I think that there are quite a few easy fixes, but I still
have to find out what causes p.e. the cracklib failure.
Karsten
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
