On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Dmitry Butskoy <buc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Arthur Pemberton wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Dmitry Butskoy <buc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Matej Cepl wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> b) If anybody is running production servers on Fedora, then worse for >>>> him >>>> >>> >>> Well, how about enthusiasm here? >>> >>> What should do some previously RedHat-oriented enthusiast, when all the >>> area >>> for application of his enthusiasm is some "production environment"? Use >>> RHEL/CentOS anywhere and Fedora on his laptop only? But RHEL/CentOS is >>> far >>> from the "bleeding edge", hence his enthusiasm just disappear... >>> >> >> >> >> I don't understand what you're saying. Why do you need to be >> bleeding-edge in your stable environments? >> > > Well, not the "bleeding-edge" literally. > > An environment, which is considered stable, can be "untypical". Ie. > "untypical production stable environment". > > All the years RHL/Fedora is used at my work, we was compelled (from time to > time) to even port some future versions/features of N+1 distro to the > current N distro. Because the features required for our "untypical" > environment have appeared somewhere closer to the bleeding-edge... Sounds like you want Centos + Extras then. Or maybe Extras isn't up to date enough, and some people may need to create a new 'Current' repo for Centos. The closest I've come to wanting something "new" in Centos was wanting a 2.4.3 (or so) Python instead of the 2.4.2 (or so) that comes with RHEL/Centos. And that was easily avoided. -- Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
