Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Dmitry Butskoy <buc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Matej Cepl wrote:
b) If anybody is running production servers on Fedora, then worse for
him
Well, how about enthusiasm here?
What should do some previously RedHat-oriented enthusiast, when all the area
for application of his enthusiasm is some "production environment"? Use
RHEL/CentOS anywhere and Fedora on his laptop only? But RHEL/CentOS is far
from the "bleeding edge", hence his enthusiasm just disappear...
I don't understand what you're saying. Why do you need to be
bleeding-edge in your stable environments?
Well, not the "bleeding-edge" literally.
An environment, which is considered stable, can be "untypical". Ie.
"untypical production stable environment".
All the years RHL/Fedora is used at my work, we was compelled (from time
to time) to even port some future versions/features of N+1 distro to the
current N distro. Because the features required for our "untypical"
environment have appeared somewhere closer to the bleeding-edge...
~buc
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list