On 07.10.2008 22:45, Christian Iseli wrote:
On Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:07:56 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
(²) According to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageStatus/CompsF10Missing
"We have 2866 packages in comps-f10 file."
"We have 1711 packages missing"
I'm not sure those stats are correct, as we afaik have way more
source and binary packages:
$ repoquery --repoid=rawhide -a | wc -l ; repoquery \
--repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src -a | wc -l
14139
6300
The discrepancy can be (at least partly) explained by the fact that the
script producing the missing stats has some heuristics about packages
to ignore. Package names matching these regexps are not flagged as
missing:
next if $k =~ /plugin/i;
next if $k =~ /^(lib|compat-|xfce4-|gtk-|kmod-|fonts?-)/i;
next if $k =~ /(-devel|lib[s0-9]*|-python|-perl|-servers?|-clients?|-tools?)$/i;
next if $k =~ /(-contribs?|-docs?|-x?emacs|-utils?|-fonts?)$/i;
Package having a summary containing this regexp:
next if $BZOWN->{$k}->{'summary'} =~ /(binding|library|module|utilit)/i;
And there is a short blacklist:
"autodownloader" => 1,
"theora-exp" => 1,
"freetype1" => 1,
"paragui" => 1
HTH...
Yes, it does, as this seems to be quite relevant for the "Which packages
should be in comps.xml and which not?" question.
CU
knurd
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
