On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 20:07 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > On 07.10.2008 18:12, Brian Pepple wrote: > > You want something to be discussed? Send a note to the list in reply to > > this mail and I'll add it to the schedule. You can also propose topics > > in the meeting while it is in the "Free discussion around Fedora" phase. > > Seems we are about to get proper suppose for comps.xml in PK sooner or > later; for details see > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg00381.html > > Which brings us back to the following mail from last month (which > resulted in a long discussion that afaics indirectly was one of the > reasons for the new PK enhancements we'll get...) > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-September/msg01813.html > > The main two questions, where I'd really like to see advice from FESCo > (or whatever committee feels responsible for this kind of task) how to > move on: > > - Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not? (¹) > > - How do we make packagers add all their packages to comps.xml? Added to the schedule. Thanks. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
