Am Dienstag, den 07.10.2008, 15:00 -0400 schrieb Bill Nottingham: > Christoph Wickert (christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > > The only argument that's sounds convincing to me (although I don't > > > > really understand it) is nottings concerns about the breaking the string > > > > freeze. Can somebody please explain this a little more in depth to me? > > > > Looking at the F10 schedule i see string freeze was on September 11, so > > > > why did nobody realize that my feature collided with string freeze > > > > anyway? > > > > > > Groups in comps (and their descriptions) are translatable strings; adding > > > or changing them breaks the string freeze. > > > > Ok then, but why did nobody from FeSCo or rel-eng realize that before? > > I'm not sure what you mean. The feature is supposed to be testable by > the feature freeze, which is the same time as the string freeze. So it > doesn't need called out specifically unless it *doesn't* make the feature > freeze. Ok, agreed, but when feature freeze was on Sept. 11th, then they could have told me _much_earlier_ that my feature was out of luck anyway. Maybe we would have find a way cope with that, for example already make the comps changes so the strings are there for translation. > Bill > Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
