Am Dienstag, den 07.10.2008, 14:46 -0400 schrieb Bill Nottingham: > Christoph Wickert (christoph.wickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > The only argument that's sounds convincing to me (although I don't > > really understand it) is nottings concerns about the breaking the string > > freeze. Can somebody please explain this a little more in depth to me? > > Looking at the F10 schedule i see string freeze was on September 11, so > > why did nobody realize that my feature collided with string freeze > > anyway? > > Groups in comps (and their descriptions) are translatable strings; adding > or changing them breaks the string freeze. Ok then, but why did nobody from FeSCo or rel-eng realize that before? And are translations really that important? It's only two strings and I remember that we had not-translated comps before. > > Bill > Regards, Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
