Re: Should we mount with reltime as default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 01:17:04PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
 > Once upon a time, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
 > > Michel Salim wrote:
 > > > Oops, yes. Incidentally, the manpage mispells it as 'realatime' in the
 > > > norelatime section; time to file a bug. No mention that relatime is
 > > > the default either -- does this belong in the manpage or in the
 > > > release notes?
 > > 
 > > probably release notes, since default relatime is a fedora-special, and
 > > not upstream.
 > 
 > I'd think that if Fedora is going to carry a custom patch to set this in
 > the kernel, Fedora could also carry a custom patch noting it in the
 > mount(8) man page.

FWIW, we don't carry that patch in the kernel any more.
Until upstream takes it, it's unlikely to come back.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux