Re: Should we mount with reltime as default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
>>> Michel Salim wrote:
>>>> Oops, yes. Incidentally, the manpage mispells it as 'realatime' in the
>>>> norelatime section; time to file a bug. No mention that relatime is
>>>> the default either -- does this belong in the manpage or in the
>>>> release notes?
>>> probably release notes, since default relatime is a fedora-special, and
>>> not upstream.
>>
>> I'd think that if Fedora is going to carry a custom patch to set this in
>> the kernel, Fedora could also carry a custom patch noting it in the
>> mount(8) man page.
>
> ok :)

Sounds good; I added that request to the bug report as well:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463979

Thanks,

-- 
miʃel salim • http://hircus.jaiku.com/
IUCS • msalim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora • salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
MacPorts • hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux