Re: Should we mount with reltime as default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
>> Michel Salim wrote:
>>> Oops, yes. Incidentally, the manpage mispells it as 'realatime' in the
>>> norelatime section; time to file a bug. No mention that relatime is
>>> the default either -- does this belong in the manpage or in the
>>> release notes?
>> probably release notes, since default relatime is a fedora-special, and
>> not upstream.
> 
> I'd think that if Fedora is going to carry a custom patch to set this in
> the kernel, Fedora could also carry a custom patch noting it in the
> mount(8) man page.

ok :)

-Eric (who at one point was going to try to clean up that patch and get
it upstream, since the author has not done so...)  :)

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux