Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
From: Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:05:41 -0400
In-reply-to: <loom.20080922T204935-419@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Red Hat
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 20:55 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote:

> 
> Those "arbitrary" classifications are what Fedora maintainers work hard to keep 
> up to date and complete, unlike your incomplete hardcoded classifications in 
> PackageKit which are truly arbitrary and do not reflect how Fedora intends to 
> categorize its packages.

What makes you think that the comps classifications are less arbitrary ?
And isn't one of the original motivations for this thread that many
packagers are exactly _not_ doing that hard work ?!


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: James Antill

References:
- How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Rahul Sundaram
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Kevin Kofler
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Tim Lauridsen
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Kevin Kofler
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Thorsten Leemhuis
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Nicolas Mailhot
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Richard Hughes
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Jesse Keating
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Richard Hughes
- Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
  - From: Kevin Kofler

Prev by Date: Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
Next by Date: Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
Previous by thread: Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
Next by thread: Re: How important is comps.xml to us these days? Which packages should be in comps.xml and which not?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]