Braden McDaniel wrote: > On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 11:54 -0400, Will Woods wrote: > > In last week's QA meeting, Chris Aillon (aka caillon, our fearless > > firefox/xulrunner maintainer) stopped by to tell us what happened with > > xulrunner dep breakage, and how package maintainers can help reduce / > > prevent it in the future. Here's a quick summary: > > > > There are two APIs provided by xulrunner - the stable API (gecko-devel), > > and the unstable one (gecko-devel-unstable). > > Why does xulrunner-devel-unstable provide some of the same headers (at a > different path) that xulrunner-devel does? I'm specifically noticing > SpiderMonkey headers; though there might be others. It's been almost two weeks and this question hasn't been answered yet, any comments anyone? -- Ville-Pekka Vainio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
