Braden McDaniel wrote: > Why does xulrunner-devel-unstable provide some of the same headers (at a > different path) that xulrunner-devel does? I'm specifically noticing > SpiderMonkey headers; though there might be others. Good question, I asked about the same thing in my mail a while ago: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-July/msg01150.html>. My package mozvoikko needs e.g. mozISpellCheckingEngine.h, which is in /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9/spellchecker/ (xulrunner-devel) and in /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9/unstable/ (xulrunner-devel-unstable). Using directories like "spellchecker" I can get mozvoikko to build without the unstable devel package, but I wonder if I need the "unstable requirements style" or will the "stable requirements style" do. -- Ville-Pekka Vainio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
