Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
Braden McDaniel wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 11:54 -0400, Will Woods wrote:
In last week's QA meeting, Chris Aillon (aka caillon, our fearless
firefox/xulrunner maintainer) stopped by to tell us what happened with
xulrunner dep breakage, and how package maintainers can help reduce /
prevent it in the future. Here's a quick summary:
There are two APIs provided by xulrunner - the stable API (gecko-devel),
and the unstable one (gecko-devel-unstable).
Why does xulrunner-devel-unstable provide some of the same headers (at a
different path) that xulrunner-devel does? I'm specifically noticing
SpiderMonkey headers; though there might be others.
It's been almost two weeks and this question hasn't been answered yet, any
comments anyone?
Hadn't noticed it sorry. Unstable builds need to be able to use the
stable headers, too. The duplication is unfortunate, but it's a
byproduct of the way the pkgconfig files are done. They include either
a stable or unstable subdirectory, and sorting out the symlinks would be
a pain.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
