Re: Conflicts in Rawhide i386 (part 2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thomas Moschny wrote:
2008/8/4 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx>:
As the coda packager, let me add the following useful info (not) I've no
idea what will break with regards to coda if this binary is renamed. It
seems to be a utility which gets called from other coda processes.

So ... it should probably be moved to %{_libexecdir}/coda/parser, no?


Maybe, I haven't investigated that close yet, as I simply don't have the time for it. Given thatb packages which contain /usr/bin/parser are pretty obscure packages, the chances of a user actually hitting this problem are small.

That does not mean that it should not be fixed, but that does make it a low priority thing for me.

Patches (from people who have done their homework and know exactly for what and when "parser" in coda is used) are welcome.

Regards,

Hans

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux