On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 14:10 +0100, Andrew Haley wrote: > dexter wrote: > > On Mon July 28 2008 11:26:15 Alan Cox wrote: > >> Seconded. I've given up on the fedora-list for the most part, and its > >> driving users way from the Fedora project. I don't care if its > >> fedora-ranting, or just fedora-without-alexanfre-and-les we set up but > >> soemthing needs doing before it has a debian-legal like toxic effect on the > >> whole userbase > > > > I like the lawless-ness of the fedora-list (it reminds me of just > > outside my window :-) ). Generally its self policing and its always > > worked upto now, but Alexandre Oliva was told on this list to STFU > > and he obliged that aint quite worked on the fedora-list. > > It surely was on-topic here to talk about whether unfree binary blobs > should be included in Fedora. Sure. But not in -devel and not -users. > > Do we really want to say that if any ethical question arises during > discussion on Fedora lists, people may not address it? > Again, ethical/political/etc questions have no place in an ML that -should- be dedicated to users who seek help. I doubt that they even have place in -testing and/or -devel. I've been subscribed to fedora-* more-or-less since FC2. For the first time in years I'm thinking about unsubscribing. - Gilboa -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
