* Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx> [20080728 15:10]: [snip] > It surely was on-topic here to talk about whether unfree binary blobs > should be included in Fedora. About the technical implementation, sure. How do you 'devel'op the mechanism to separate out the firmware and still be able to deliver it. > Do we really want to say that if any ethical question arises during > discussion on Fedora lists, people may not address it? Then migrate the subsequent flame-fest and inflamatory statements to fedora-political, fedora-flames or fedora-legal ? Let it rot in peace in obscurity, where such quasi-religious discussions belong. The .advocacy groups on usenet is well known for being the playground to hone your argumentation skills. Do we want fedora-list (where users ask for help) or fedora-devel (where serious development discussions are supposed to take place) to be this playground? I'd be somewhat surprised if anyone answered yes to that question. /Anders -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
