Re: Calling on Fedora/RedHat ML managers to clean up Fedora-list.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 02:10:14PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> It surely was on-topic here to talk about whether unfree binary blobs
>> should be included in Fedora.
> 
> I think it was. But the million message circular arguments about GPL 
> interpretation were most definitely not, and the result of that was that
> everyone put the participants, subject or even the entire list on kill

Sure, that's true, and perhaps we need a little more taste and restraint.
However, there were some untruths about the GPL that needed to be
corrected on the list.

>> Do we really want to say that if any ethical question arises during
>> discussion on Fedora lists, people may not address it?
> 
> Do you really want everyone to unsubscribe and run something else.

Their call.  I'm not sure I really understand the problem; a thread gets
boring and repetitive, so can it.

Andrew.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux