On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 14:49 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 2:38 PM, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 21:37 +0200, David Nielsen wrote: > > > >> > >> 2 words that will save a lot of time in a debate with such fudders, > >> "Evidence Please", watch how they automatically discredit themselves > >> as uninformed trolls who completely misunderstand the burden of proof. > >> It is not up to us to counter FUD, it is up to them to prove the truth > >> of their argument. > >> > > > > To be fair yum and rpm have not done a good enough job publicizing > > useful and interesting changes/features in the last couple of years. > > > > There have been a lot. > > > > -sv > > > I try my best to follow this list, and the last major RPM related > thread that I remember was mostly a debate between the current RPM and > RPM5. Either way, glad to see things are progressing. This is not the list where rpm-devel goes on. rpm-maint@xxxxxxx is that list. better yet, follow the git repo checkins. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
