On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Very cool news. I look forward to the SIG, the spin and seeing Fedora > on even more cool devices :-) > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/23/moblin_reworked/ Here's what's not clear.... is intel going to look to talk with us about making this part of the larger Fedora project or is it going to be a downstream derived distribution that will include components such that it can not carry the Fedora name? Or are they planning to just leverage the existing Fedora distribution bits and do their own thing in a way that isn't aligned with existing Fedora contribution guidance? Have I missed a discussion concerning Moblin interaction with Fedora in the "project" sense? If I have please point me to it so I can read up. A number of questions spring to mind, chief among them whether the new Moblin can be incorporated under our secondary arch policy? How different is the Atom processor anyways? If they are serious about making this more attractive to developers, I think we need to have a serious discussion about whether or not the technical work they are doing can and should live under the Fedora project umbrella. Can/Should Moblin be the part of the Fedora project aimed at mobile devices? Sharing to some extent policy, best practices guidance, and contributor-base. Or should it sit outside our project completely? -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
