>> Very cool news. I look forward to the SIG, the spin and seeing Fedora >> on even more cool devices :-) >> >> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/07/23/moblin_reworked/ > > Here's what's not clear.... is intel going to look to talk with us > about making this part of the larger Fedora project or is it going to > be a downstream derived distribution that will include components such > that it can not carry the Fedora name? Or are they planning to just > leverage the existing Fedora distribution bits and do their own thing > in a way that isn't aligned with existing Fedora contribution > guidance? Have I missed a discussion concerning Moblin interaction > with Fedora in the "project" sense? If I have please point me to it so > I can read up. No idea, would be cool if they contributed and there was a SIG and a MID Spin. > A number of questions spring to mind, chief among them whether the new > Moblin can be incorporated under our secondary arch policy? How > different is the Atom processor anyways? If they are serious about > making this more attractive to developers, I think we need to have a > serious discussion about whether or not the technical work they are > doing can and should live under the Fedora project umbrella. > Can/Should Moblin be the part of the Fedora project aimed at mobile > devices? Sharing to some extent policy, best practices guidance, and > contributor-base. Or should it sit outside our project completely? There's some pretty good details of the atom processor stuff at Tom's hardware. There's two strains, one which is in a lot of the NetBook devices and one for iPhone style devices. http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-atom-cpu,1947.html Peter -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
