On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 2:48 PM, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 14:49 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 2:38 PM, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 21:37 +0200, David Nielsen wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> 2 words that will save a lot of time in a debate with such fudders, >> >> "Evidence Please", watch how they automatically discredit themselves >> >> as uninformed trolls who completely misunderstand the burden of proof. >> >> It is not up to us to counter FUD, it is up to them to prove the truth >> >> of their argument. >> >> >> > >> > To be fair yum and rpm have not done a good enough job publicizing >> > useful and interesting changes/features in the last couple of years. >> > >> > There have been a lot. >> > >> > -sv >> >> >> I try my best to follow this list, and the last major RPM related >> thread that I remember was mostly a debate between the current RPM and >> RPM5. Either way, glad to see things are progressing. > > This is not the list where rpm-devel goes on. rpm-maint@xxxxxxx is that > list. > > better yet, follow the git repo checkins. Merci -- Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine ( www.pembo13.com ) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
