Steve Grubb wrote:
On Friday 18 July 2008 09:11:21 Rex Dieter wrote:
Bill Nottingham wrote:
For a really long time now, we've shipped both gnupg and gnupg2
in Fedora. In fact, in Fedora 9 a relatively standard install will
get both installed.
It appears a good number of these can be ported to gnupg2, if not
all of them. Should we wire up a feature page?
Imo, yes, it's a worthy goal to get these ported so that at least gnupg(1)
doesn't land in any default install.
fyi, here's my inquiry upstrem on whether it's possible or a good idea to
try dropping gnupg1:
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2008-July/024485.html
answer: probably not a good idea.
Why did you come to that conclusion? We don't support IDEA and Suse did
mention that they have switched to only GPG2. The only caution is around
gpg-agent.
based on Werner Koch's response:
http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2008-July/024490.html
"You should don't remove gnupg-1 from a distribution..."
shrug, I'm ok either way.
-- Rex
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
