Bill Nottingham wrote: > For a really long time now, we've shipped both gnupg and gnupg2 > in Fedora. In fact, in Fedora 9 a relatively standard install will > get both installed. ... > It appears a good number of these can be ported to gnupg2, if not > all of them. Should we wire up a feature page? Imo, yes, it's a worthy goal to get these ported so that at least gnupg(1) doesn't land in any default install. fyi, here's my inquiry upstrem on whether it's possible or a good idea to try dropping gnupg1: http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2008-July/024485.html (come to think of it, my question there wasn't phrased all too well, but the feedback was insightful) answer: probably not a good idea. So, that leaves consolidating/standardizing on gnupg2, as something still worthwhile. -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
