On Friday 18 July 2008 09:11:21 Rex Dieter wrote: > Bill Nottingham wrote: > > For a really long time now, we've shipped both gnupg and gnupg2 > > in Fedora. In fact, in Fedora 9 a relatively standard install will > > get both installed. > > > It appears a good number of these can be ported to gnupg2, if not > > all of them. Should we wire up a feature page? > > Imo, yes, it's a worthy goal to get these ported so that at least gnupg(1) > doesn't land in any default install. > > fyi, here's my inquiry upstrem on whether it's possible or a good idea to > try dropping gnupg1: > http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2008-July/024485.html > > answer: probably not a good idea. Why did you come to that conclusion? We don't support IDEA and Suse did mention that they have switched to only GPG2. The only caution is around gpg-agent. > So, that leaves consolidating/standardizing on gnupg2, as something still > worthwhile. Agreed. We need to pursue this as GPG1 cannot take advantage of any FIPS-140-2 certified libraries. We need to find the rough spots and work them out. -Steve -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
