Re: No answer to easy bug policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 03:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
This is meant to be a addition/modification of the non responsive maintainer's policy as noted in

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-July/msg00744.html


What I meant by fix up is have the same time to respond and same outcome
period, instead of a ton of different potential timeouts and responses.
The various stages of timeouts are confusing to begin with, having to
choose one and remember to follow which one is even worse.

Ah, yes. That makes sense. Policy modified according to your suggestion along with Toshio's.

Rahul

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux