Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 10:59:24AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 02:04:47AM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RahulSundaram/CollectiveMaintenance
I have hopefully adressed th ecomments, by stating that this is a policy
for bug fixes, not easy bug as such. Also added a 3 weeks delay before
the procedure is started, precise a bit what is a bug easy to fix and
put explicitely the cleaning of blocker bugs on the reporter.
Still on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RahulSundaram/CollectiveMaintenance
Instead of orphaning, what about adding comaintainers? That makes for
more responsibility on the part of the person who thinks that the bug is
an easy fix to evaluate this in terms of correctness, the future effects
of the patch, and what is going on upstream.
The intro covers that:
"If this occurs over a long period of time, the maintainers should seek
out co-maintainers or just be orphaning the software packages they are
not interested in. If it does happen for a shorter periods, others can
act as a buffer to avoid the problem lingering for our user"
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
