On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 13:42 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > What I'm asking is instead of: > > "If you don't answer after 2 weeks, a reminder should be sent, and if > not answered within a further 2 weeks the package will be orphaned > according to the policy stated at" > > We could have: > > "If you don't answer after 2 weeks, a reminder should be sent, and if > not answered within a further 2 weeks My_Username will be assigned as a > comaintainer and can make changes according to the policy stated at" Instead of creating a bunch of different ways to "timeout" a maintainer and "do something" after the fact, why can't we just fix up the non-responsive policy? I'd rather have one policy than n+ for each situation. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
