On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 12:22:04PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > > This is not a typical non-responsive maintainer problem. His email account > listed on the package db entry is closed for a fact. So, why follow a > proceedure that will take a few weeks when I know for a fact that I need to > reassign some packages? :) It is true that it is not the typical non responsive policy, but I think that it is covered nevertheless, with a bit of interpretation. If you remove the reference to the bug which doesn't make sense, indeed one gets: Others can add to the bug that they also were not successful in contacting the maintainer, or providing additional contact information for the maintainer (ie, alternative email, irc, etc). > I suspect the orphaning process should be followed in cases like this - but > before its too late. I don't think it makes much sense. I'll try to make a proposal soon to cover that in the Non-responsive Maintainer Policy. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
