Re: Orphaned packages not! (splat, gpsman, nec2c)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri June 6 2008, Steve Grubb wrote:

> This is not a typical non-responsive maintainer problem. His email account
> listed on the package db entry is closed for a fact. So, why follow a
> proceedure that will take a few weeks when I know for a fact that I need to
> reassign some packages?  :)

Did he also loose his FAS account? If not, then he could have updated his 
email address in FAS.

Regards,
Till

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux