On Friday 06 June 2008 12:01:33 Patrice Dumas wrote: > There is > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Policy/NonResponsiveMainta >iners (and > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages > ) > > > Yes, if you were still wanting to maintain a few of these, it was an > > accident and this would be my fault. I apologize for this. I checked a > > couple security packages that needs work and they had your old redhat > > address. So, I asked for your packages to be released so that we could > > continue working on them. > > Why didn't you go through the process outlined in the policy? Is it > because you didn't know about it? This is not a typical non-responsive maintainer problem. His email account listed on the package db entry is closed for a fact. So, why follow a proceedure that will take a few weeks when I know for a fact that I need to reassign some packages? :) I suspect the orphaning process should be followed in cases like this - but before its too late. -Steve -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
