On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 06:16:47PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > That would break scripts etc that assume the cyphesis-selinux package is still > available (either as a real package, or a Provides somewhere else). Why > would it be a good thing to intentionally cause this breakage? It seems to me that in some case (and here it could be such a case) it is acceptable not to be backward compatible, here in order to have the stand-alone cyphesis-selinux package completly disappear, and avoid inflating the number of provides. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
