Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:27:19AM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
Is (a) an acceptable solution?
I think so.
I think so too but it might be worth adding:
Conflicts: selinux-policy < first-VR-including-cyphesis-policy
I am not sure that it is really needed. Better have the obsolete in
selinux-policy and a corresponding provides in that case.
Why would the Provides: be necessary? The Obsoletes: should make sure
that the cyphesis-selinux package gets removed, and later attempts to
install/upgrade the no-longer-valid cyphesis-selinux package should fail.
--Wart
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
