On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:27:19AM +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > >>> Is (a) an acceptable solution? >> >> I think so. > > I think so too but it might be worth adding: > > Conflicts: selinux-policy < first-VR-including-cyphesis-policy I am not sure that it is really needed. Better have the obsolete in selinux-policy and a corresponding provides in that case. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
