Josh, On Sat, 2008-05-31 at 11:15 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > I'd rather do this under the PPC SIG, rather than create a whole new > one just for Cell. That makes sense. > Now, providing a whole new toolchain might be possible but you'd have > to make sure it doesn't conflict with the stock toolchains. At the moment I'm just looking at providing tools prefixed with "spu-" such as spu-as, spu-ld, spu-gcc etc... I don't expect conflicts as these packages are based on the current gcc versions in Fedora (with the same patches). -- Aidan Delaney -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
