Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"HdG" == Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx> writes:
HdG> hylafax is quite well known so I would expect "yum install
HdG> hylafax" to just work, but also something like rpm -q hylafax.
Well, I'd certainly agree, if this was actually the hylafax software.
But it's not; it's the hylafax+ software. I'll freely admit that
nobody so far has tried to get the hylafax sotfware into Fedora, and
perhaps that will never happen. If we assume that it will never
happen, then we have no conflict and I suppose we don't care. I'm not
sure that we can make this assumption, though.
Well the question here IMHO is not so much how to name the package as it is
which fork to package, making them parallel installable will be very hard todo
and AFAIK we don't want conflicting packages. Now reading this imho pretty
neutral description of the various forks:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HylaFAX
I believe that hylafax+ best fits Fedora.
Regards,
Hans
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
