Valent Turkovic wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 1:54 AM, Lennart Poettering
<mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 24.05.08 00:34, Bastien Nocera (bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 16:51 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Rahul Sundaram (sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
It seems libflashsupport was dropped out of the default package list in
Fedora 9 and I didn't see any public discussion on the reasons behind this
change (release notes didn't get updated either until recently
unfortunately) Can someone familiar with this change explain the reason?
Check the FESCo logs... general reasoning is that it existed solely
as a crutch for third-party software, IIRC.
And I'm sure the people who came up with that idea made sure to nicely
ask Adobe to make their Flash plugins depend on it. Or explained to them
what that tool did so they can fix their software.
Adobe Flash 10 doesn't need libflashsupport anymore to work fine on
ALSA ioplug-based backends such as pulse.
Lennart
Current version of Flash 10 doesn't work with Firefox under linux.
Cheers,
Valent.
Well... Mozilla's understanding of beta and Adobe's are different.
mozilla beta: works most of the time
adobe beta: sometimes works, sometimes doesn't
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
