On Sat, 24.05.08 00:34, Bastien Nocera (bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 16:51 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Rahul Sundaram (sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > It seems libflashsupport was dropped out of the default package list in > > > Fedora 9 and I didn't see any public discussion on the reasons behind this > > > change (release notes didn't get updated either until recently > > > unfortunately) Can someone familiar with this change explain the reason? > > > > Check the FESCo logs... general reasoning is that it existed solely > > as a crutch for third-party software, IIRC. > > And I'm sure the people who came up with that idea made sure to nicely > ask Adobe to make their Flash plugins depend on it. Or explained to them > what that tool did so they can fix their software. Adobe Flash 10 doesn't need libflashsupport anymore to work fine on ALSA ioplug-based backends such as pulse. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net ICQ# 11060553 http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
