On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 1:54 AM, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, 24.05.08 00:34, Bastien Nocera (bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > >> >> On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 16:51 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> > Rahul Sundaram (sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: >> > > It seems libflashsupport was dropped out of the default package list in >> > > Fedora 9 and I didn't see any public discussion on the reasons behind this >> > > change (release notes didn't get updated either until recently >> > > unfortunately) Can someone familiar with this change explain the reason? >> > >> > Check the FESCo logs... general reasoning is that it existed solely >> > as a crutch for third-party software, IIRC. >> >> And I'm sure the people who came up with that idea made sure to nicely >> ask Adobe to make their Flash plugins depend on it. Or explained to them >> what that tool did so they can fix their software. > > Adobe Flash 10 doesn't need libflashsupport anymore to work fine on > ALSA ioplug-based backends such as pulse. > > Lennart Current version of Flash 10 doesn't work with Firefox under linux. Cheers, Valent. -- http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
