On Wed, 21 May 2008 21:28:21 -0300 Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On May 21, 2008, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Ok, then I'll call it an alternate kernel package. Which we still > > aren't going to allow. > > > However doing that with an alternative kernel > > package isn't something that sits well. > > > I'm talking about having any alternate kernel, period. > > I have never opposed the idea of replacing the non-Free kernel Fedora > ships today with linux-libre or any of its predecessors. I just > thought proposing it as an alternative that I offered to maintain > myself would generate less heat. Maybe I was mistaken. I didn't say you were going to outright replace it. But having more than one kernel package will not be allowed. It has been discussed in the past for things not even related to kernel-libre. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
