On May 21, 2008, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ok, then I'll call it an alternate kernel package. Which we still > aren't going to allow. > However doing that with an alternative kernel > package isn't something that sits well. > I'm talking about having any alternate kernel, period. I have never opposed the idea of replacing the non-Free kernel Fedora ships today with linux-libre or any of its predecessors. I just thought proposing it as an alternative that I offered to maintain myself would generate less heat. Maybe I was mistaken. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} FSFLA Board Member ¡Sé Libre! => http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
