Re: Xorg 1.5 missed the train?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Todd Zullinger wrote:
Christopher Stone wrote:
Why the H.E. double hockey sticks do people think proving
compatibility packages for nVidia users will somehow hold the
desktop hostage for everyone else?

I do not understand why ajax could not provide compatibility rpms
for nVidia users?  Is he not paid by redhat?  I mean just how
difficult can it be to provide F8 xorg rpms on F9 for nVidia users??

I wouldn't be surprised if ajax came after you with a few hockey
sticks for suggesting that he do all that extra work just to support
some binary drivers. :)

After all, it increases the apparent value of the stable RHEL to contrast it with fedora pushing things out before a stable version release that other vendors can support.

--
  Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux