Re: Xorg 1.5 missed the train?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christopher Stone wrote:
> Why the H.E. double hockey sticks do people think proving
> compatibility packages for nVidia users will somehow hold the
> desktop hostage for everyone else?
> 
> I do not understand why ajax could not provide compatibility rpms
> for nVidia users?  Is he not paid by redhat?  I mean just how
> difficult can it be to provide F8 xorg rpms on F9 for nVidia users??

I wouldn't be surprised if ajax came after you with a few hockey
sticks for suggesting that he do all that extra work just to support
some binary drivers. :)

Use F-8 for a while longer if you really must have nvidia drivers.

-- 
Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nothing is wrong with California that a rise in the ocean level
wouldn't cure.
    -- Ross MacDonald (1915-1983)

Attachment: pgpGqIeSQU7k5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux